Treba da dokazem Borov postulat, tacnije L=nh(h sa crtom, kao cirilicno ć), krenuvsi od pretpostavke da je L=na pri cemu je a=const. Treba da se dokaze da a mora da bude h sa crtom. S.O.S. :)
Moram priznati da me je ovo pitanje zbunilo. U raznolikoj literaturi koju posedujem nisam pronašao odgovor. Zbog toga sam ga postavio na jednom američkom sajtu, gde fizičari odgovaraju na raznorazna pitanja:
QUESTION:
If we postulate that L=n*a, a=const (Bohr's postulate), how we can testify that a=h/2π?
ANSWER:
There are lots of ways you can come up with Bohr's postulate, but when one first proposes a radical idea like this one the choice of constant is often empirical, that is you choose a constant which gives the right answers, in this case the energy levels of the hydrogen atom, the wavelengths of the spectrum.
Moram priznati da me je ovo
Moram priznati da me je ovo pitanje zbunilo. U raznolikoj literaturi koju posedujem nisam pronašao odgovor. Zbog toga sam ga postavio na jednom američkom sajtu, gde fizičari odgovaraju na raznorazna pitanja:
QUESTION:
If we postulate that L=n*a, a=const (Bohr's postulate), how we can testify that a=h/2π?
ANSWER:
There are lots of ways you can come up with Bohr's postulate, but when one first proposes a radical idea like this one the choice of constant is often empirical, that is you choose a constant which gives the right answers, in this case the energy levels of the hydrogen atom, the wavelengths of the spectrum.